<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for graduatedTaste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graduatedtaste.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Lists of Successful Companies to Get your Startup Juices Flowing by Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/09/12/lists-of-successful-companies-to-get-your-startup-juices-flowing/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=36#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Now everyone is talking about the American economy and eclections, nice to read something different. Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now everyone is talking about the American economy and eclections, nice to read something different. Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lists of Successful Companies to Get your Startup Juices Flowing by Need inspiration for your tech startup? &#124; Random Play</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/09/12/lists-of-successful-companies-to-get-your-startup-juices-flowing/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Need inspiration for your tech startup? &#124; Random Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=36#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] Lists of Successful Companies to Get your Startup Juices Flowing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lists of Successful Companies to Get your Startup Juices Flowing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Senator Martinez&#8217;s Response by Steve Place</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/07/12/senator-martinezs-response/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=33#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Well unless you live in the state of Florida, Mr. Martinez doesn't care what you think.

And Obama had nothing to do with this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well unless you live in the state of Florida, Mr. Martinez doesn&#8217;t care what you think.</p>
<p>And Obama had nothing to do with this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Senator Martinez&#8217;s Response by Auston</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/07/12/senator-martinezs-response/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Auston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=33#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I call bullshit on Senator Martinez, as well as Senator Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call bullshit on Senator Martinez, as well as Senator Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Letter that I&#8217;m Overnighting to My Senator by Senator Martinez&#8217;s Response &#124; graduatedTaste</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/07/07/the-letter-that-im-overnighting-to-my-senator/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Martinez&#8217;s Response &#124; graduatedTaste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=32#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] received a follow up to the letter I sent in to Senartor Martinez about the FISA Amendments Act (HR 6304). It&#8217;s a bit canned, but I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] received a follow up to the letter I sent in to Senartor Martinez about the FISA Amendments Act (HR 6304). It&#8217;s a bit canned, but I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Letter that I&#8217;m Overnighting to My Senator by S. Carter McNeese</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/07/07/the-letter-that-im-overnighting-to-my-senator/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Carter McNeese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=32#comment-29</guid>
		<description>This is an amazing letter, laying out in a logical way the reason that we need to oppose this bill.  

Great job Steve.....


SCM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an amazing letter, laying out in a logical way the reason that we need to oppose this bill.  </p>
<p>Great job Steve&#8230;..</p>
<p>SCM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Offshore Drilling in Florida is a Good Idea by Rammer8</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/06/18/why-offshore-drilling-in-florida-is-a-good-idea/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Rammer8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=26#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Florida  is  in a  depression  NOW...Not  20-30  years  in  the  future.  Offshore  drilling  on both  coasts  will  yield  a  5-7  year supply  of  oil,maximum..There  is  more  oil onshore  in  sand  and  shale  formations..But the  fricking  Big  Oil  companies  don't want  competition...And  Saudi  Arabia  has,  approximately  50  billion  barrels  left..At  current  consumption  rates,that  is  less  than  SIX  years  left..Thats  right  all  OPEC  countries  have  LIED  about  their  total recoverable reserves.  And  now  the  world  is  going  to  face  the  consequences. And  alternate  energy  sources  will  take  5-10  years,minimum. to  come  online.. So  people  can  speculate  about  what  may  happen  in the  future  all they  want..History  will  prove  most  WRONG  and  facts  will  expose  the  scam  that is  OPEC...By  the  way,how  much  drilling   is   currently  happening  off  the coasts  of  Australia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida  is  in a  depression  NOW&#8230;Not  20-30  years  in  the  future.  Offshore  drilling  on both  coasts  will  yield  a  5-7  year supply  of  oil,maximum..There  is  more  oil onshore  in  sand  and  shale  formations..But the  fricking  Big  Oil  companies  don&#8217;t want  competition&#8230;And  Saudi  Arabia  has,  approximately  50  billion  barrels  left..At  current  consumption  rates,that  is  less  than  SIX  years  left..Thats  right  all  OPEC  countries  have  LIED  about  their  total recoverable reserves.  And  now  the  world  is  going  to  face  the  consequences. And  alternate  energy  sources  will  take  5-10  years,minimum. to  come  online.. So  people  can  speculate  about  what  may  happen  in the  future  all they  want..History  will  prove  most  WRONG  and  facts  will  expose  the  scam  that is  OPEC&#8230;By  the  way,how  much  drilling   is   currently  happening  off  the coasts  of  Australia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Save Twitter by Steve Place</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/06/22/how-to-save-twitter/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=28#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I guess you heard about they guy who got fired for putting up the Russert death on Twitter

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/business/media/23link.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you heard about they guy who got fired for putting up the Russert death on Twitter</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/business/media/23link.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/business/media/23link.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Save Twitter by dave</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/06/22/how-to-save-twitter/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=28#comment-22</guid>
		<description>But at the same time, I do see your point that if it weren't for major news outlets, these Twits would never have happened.  The same for Tim Russert, we still depend on news outlets to find these things out and then pass it along.  This is a great topic for research, fwiw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But at the same time, I do see your point that if it weren&#8217;t for major news outlets, these Twits would never have happened.  The same for Tim Russert, we still depend on news outlets to find these things out and then pass it along.  This is a great topic for research, fwiw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Save Twitter by dave</title>
		<link>http://www.graduatedtaste.com/2008/06/22/how-to-save-twitter/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graduatedtaste.com/?p=28#comment-21</guid>
		<description>But see, the fact that the Internet powers the virility of these things is what makes it beautiful, and the argument of "what I had for lunch" is a terrible oversimplification of why Twitter matters.  I do acknowledge it can be a great source for news and early-alert, but I can't say a systemized approach to making it a hit within news is the ideal way to go.

I've preached it on my blog and on others for the longest time: just because you call it viral marketing doesn't mean it is.  Now, I know we're not talking explicitly about viral marketing here, but the principles remain.  Jumping on a system like Twitter, using it to publish news with a fancy CNN or Fox News stamp and then calling it Journalsim doesn't grant you any more profundity than you deserve, SIMPLY because you're using a service that's already a smash hit when it comes to delivering quick, broad, updates on a given topic.

Case in point, George Carlin.  Within 20 minutes a Summize.com search for Carlin had over 20 pages of Twitter updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But see, the fact that the Internet powers the virility of these things is what makes it beautiful, and the argument of &#8220;what I had for lunch&#8221; is a terrible oversimplification of why Twitter matters.  I do acknowledge it can be a great source for news and early-alert, but I can&#8217;t say a systemized approach to making it a hit within news is the ideal way to go.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve preached it on my blog and on others for the longest time: just because you call it viral marketing doesn&#8217;t mean it is.  Now, I know we&#8217;re not talking explicitly about viral marketing here, but the principles remain.  Jumping on a system like Twitter, using it to publish news with a fancy CNN or Fox News stamp and then calling it Journalsim doesn&#8217;t grant you any more profundity than you deserve, SIMPLY because you&#8217;re using a service that&#8217;s already a smash hit when it comes to delivering quick, broad, updates on a given topic.</p>
<p>Case in point, George Carlin.  Within 20 minutes a Summize.com search for Carlin had over 20 pages of Twitter updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
